then, Sam immediately fired back.作者: Diver 时间: 2012-8-25 03:04
圣何塞的陪审团得出结论了。
果子要过1000了。
catbear 发表于 2012-8-24 19:13
Will Sumsung accept the US court's judgement? And does that judgement have legal power in other countries outside US?作者: Diver 时间: 2012-8-25 03:06
then, Sam immediately fired back.
silicon_beaver 发表于 2012-8-25 02:42
Now the key question for us is how will that US judgement affect AAPL price next Monday?作者: kami2008 时间: 2012-8-25 04:17
Will Sumsung accept the US court's judgement? And does that judgement have legal power in ...
Diver 发表于 2012-8-25 03:04
No, US judgment does not have legal power in other jurisdictions. Patents are country specific. Even if galaxy infringes iPad's patent in the US it may not ingringe iPad's patent in the other countries. In fact iPad may not have patent in certain jurisdictions and even they have the contents my be different作者: cellphone 时间: 2012-8-25 07:26
米国保护本国企业是意料之中的事。。。
最终消费者才是主要的。。。三星 galaxy III 市场比想象的好。。作者: 無心風月 时间: 2012-8-25 10:26
作者: Diver 时间: 2012-8-25 13:30
米国保护本国企业是意料之中的事。。。
最终消费者才是主要的。。。三星 galaxy III 市场比想象的好。。
cellphone 发表于 2012-8-25 07:26
我也觉得是这样。作者: dsp 时间: 2012-8-25 13:52
SanJose。
苹果老家
garfieldking 发表于 2012-8-24 23:00
cuptino is apple's hometown. but CA govt. earns huge tax from APPL. No any doubt the court should bias to it.